Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lessons in 'Human Biology': Testing a theory of exhibition design

Testing a theory of exhibition design
Authors: Roger S. Miles;

Lessons in 'Human Biology': Testing a theory of exhibition design

Abstract

An Exhibition of Ourselves, in the Hall of Human Biology, is the largest exhibition opened in recent years in the British Museum (Natural History), London (Miles and Tout, 1978). It covers about 1100 square metres, was opened in 1977, and is now known simply as Human Biology. Characterized by critics as ‘rather like a cheap disco’ and ‘a hideous portent of modernization yet to come’, it has always been extremely popular with visitors and, according to our evidence, successful. The primary purpose of this paper is to look below the surface of such conflicting responses, and examine the theoretical foundations of the exhibition’s design. In the late 1960s and early 1970s a small number of American workers developed a general theory of exhibition design based on current educational and psychological research (e.g. Shettel et al., 1968; Screven, 1969; Shettel, 1973; Lakota and Kantner, 1976). The importance of Human Biology, and the reason why it is worth additional study, is that it was a comprehensive attempt to apply and test such a coherent theory in a large, permanent educational exhibition. And it is timely to publish this account now, because the major work of evaluating and revising the exhibition has drawn to a close. The role and status of a theory of exhibition design have been summarized by Shettel et al. (1968):

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!