
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 7523933
Dithiocarbamate fungicides are widely used in agriculture for protection of vegetable crops and seeds. The mutagenicity spectra of ziram, thiram, zineb S-65 and ETU were determined by employing a battery of test systems included the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA104, TA1535, TA1538), the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain D61.M) and the shallot Allium ascalonicum somatic cells. Plate incorporation assay with S. typhimurium demonstrated direct mutagenicity of ziram in TA100 and thiram in TA100 and TA98 whereas zineb S-65 and ETU were ineffective. Tests for mitotic chromosome malsegregation in S. cerevisiae D61.M gave positive results with thiram, zineb S-69 and ETU. In shallot somatic root-tip cells ziram, thiram and ETU induced different genetic damages e.g. mitotic disturbance, polyploidy and micronuclei.
Salmonella typhimurium, Zineb, Mutagenicity Tests, Dithiocarbamates, Point reverse mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Thiram, Aneuploidy, Allium, Fungicides, Industrial, Polyploidy, Micronucleus, Ethylnitrosourea, Ziram, Mitotic disturbance, Dithiocarbamates; Point reverse mutation; Aneuploidy; Mitotic disturbance; Polyploidy; Micronucleus, Mutagens
Salmonella typhimurium, Zineb, Mutagenicity Tests, Dithiocarbamates, Point reverse mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Thiram, Aneuploidy, Allium, Fungicides, Industrial, Polyploidy, Micronucleus, Ethylnitrosourea, Ziram, Mitotic disturbance, Dithiocarbamates; Point reverse mutation; Aneuploidy; Mitotic disturbance; Polyploidy; Micronucleus, Mutagens
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | 
