Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Prostheti...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Article . 1971 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Compatibility of alginate impression materials and dental stones

Authors: Cecil E. Brown; Joseph M. Powell; Kenneth D. Rudd; Robert M. Morrow; Bruce E. Stansbury; Jacques A. deLorimier;

Compatibility of alginate impression materials and dental stones

Abstract

Abstract Four alginate (irreversible hydrocolloid) impression materials certified as meeting A.D.A. specification 18 for hydrocolloid impression materials were tested for compatibility with five dental stones (20 tests). Five samples of each alginate-stone combination were made and evaluated (100 casts). The method of determining compatibility was a modification of the one given in A.D.A. specification 18 for dental hydrocolloid impression material. The principal changes from the test for compatibility with gypsum given in specification 18 are as follows: 1. The 0.025 mm. wide line produced by the stainless steel test block was used instead of the 0.075 mm. wide line for the evaluation. 2. Each test sample was scored 1, 2, 3, or 4 according to the quality of reproduction of the 0.025 mm. wide line. 3. Evaluation and scoring were accomplished under magnification (x10) using reproducible low-angle illumination. 4. Alginate impression materials and stones used in the study were mixed with a mechanical spatulator under reduced atmospheric pressure. The test casts were scored by four dentists on three successive days. An analysis of variance procedure was applied to the sums of the three replicates for each dentist. Di-Keen appeared to be more compatible with the impression materials tested than were the other stones; whereas, Jeltrate generally appeared to be more compatible with the dental stones tested than any of the other impression materials. The Di-Keen-Jeltrate combination appeared to be the most compatible combination, but it was not statistically better than the Di-Keen-D-P and Vel-Mix-Jeltrate combinations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Analysis of Variance, Dental Materials, Alginates, Dental Impression Materials, Calcium Sulfate, Models, Dental

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    48
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
48
Average
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!