Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Molecular...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Molecular Biology
Article . 1973 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Transcription of chromatin by bacterial RNA polymerase

Authors: Ronald H. Reeder;

Transcription of chromatin by bacterial RNA polymerase

Abstract

Abstract The ability of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to transcribe chromatin from mouse and frog (Xenopus laevis) liver was examined. In mouse liver chromatin, E. coli polymerase did not transcribe the mouse satellite sequences, although it did transcribe them in deproteinized DNA. In confirmation of previous reports, unlabeled mouse liver nuclear RNA competes more efficiently for the hybridization of chromatin transcripts to bulk DNA than it does with transcripts of deproteinized DNA. However, when chromatin and DNA transcripts were hybridized to mouse DNA from which the satellite sequences had been removed, they hybridized and competed identically. It is concluded that this type of hybridization-competition experiment is a very insensitive way to assay the fidelity of chromatin transcription. In chromatin from the frog, both the genes for rRNA and the genes for 5 S RNA are transcribed but in an aberrant manner. Transcription occurred on both strands and in the gene as well as spacer regions. In the F1 hybrid between X. laevis andX. mulleri, transcription of theX. mulleri rDNA † is repressed by over 95% in vivo (Honjo & Reeder, 1973). In chromatin from such hybrid frogs, E. coli RNA polymerase transcribed at least 25% X. mulleri rRNA, indicating that the bacterial polymerase could not recognize the repression mechanism. These studies suggest that transcription of chromatin by E. coli RNA polymerase is much less accurate than previously claimed.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Transcription, Genetic, Xenopus, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Phosphorus Isotopes, DNA, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Tritium, Chromatin, Mice, Liver, Escherichia coli, Animals, RNA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    142
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
142
Average
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?