<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 4577703
Abstract Thirty-three specimens of dental calculus were examined for species of Actinomyces, Arachnia, Rothia and Bacterionema using the fluorescent antibody (FA) technique. Each specimen contained 2–4 species of Actinomyces with A. israelii being present in 99 per cent of the specimens but A. bovis was not found in any specimen. When all 9 Actinomycetaceae species were considered, the number of species per sample ranged from 3 to 7. The total Actinomycetaceae count had a mean of 1·9 × 107 organisms per gram wet weight, while the total microscopic count had a mean of 8·9 × 1010 organisms per gram wet weight. The FA technique rapidly and specifically identifies species of Actinomycetaceae in dental material, and with further improvement will be applicable for the enumeration of these organisms.
Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria, Actinomycetales, Actinomyces, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Cell Count, Dental Calculus
Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria, Actinomycetales, Actinomyces, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Cell Count, Dental Calculus
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |