
pmid: 13458602
Abstract 1. 1. The increase in wound infection on a surgical service led to a study of possible sources. 2. 2. The infection rate has no relation to monthly admission rate, number of “dirty” cases admitted or number of operative procedures. 3. 3. Staph. aureus was present on the skin or in the noses of 49 per cent of patients and 74 per cent of the house staff. 4. 4. Blankets are a major source of contamination on the wards. 5. 5. The air of wards and operating rooms is laden with offending bacteria. 6. 6. Preoperative preparation of the skin lowers the bacterial flora but does not eliminate it. 7. 7. Silence is more valuable than masking.
Surgical Procedures, Operative, Surgical Wound Infection, Infections
Surgical Procedures, Operative, Surgical Wound Infection, Infections
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
