Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Uterine perforation during sterilization by laparoscopy and minilaparotomy

Authors: I-cheng Chi; Paul J. Feldblum;

Uterine perforation during sterilization by laparoscopy and minilaparotomy

Abstract

International data on sterilized patients collected by the International Fertility Research Program (IFRP) were examined to determine the incidence of uterine perforation due to a sterilization procedure. Data on 16379 patients who underwent laparoscopic sterilization and 4378 who underwent minilaparotomy sterilization were reported to the IFRP through 18 medical centers from 11 countries during the January 1974 to October 1976 period. All the centers used standardized record forms and protocols. A total of 38 uterine perforations were identified: 29 among the laparoscopic sterilization group and 9 among the minilaparotomy group representing a rate of 1.8 and 2.1/1000 procedures respectively. Each patient who sustained a uterine perforation (case) was matched with 2 women who had no identified uterine perforation (controls) by center operator and route of approach. Control patients had undergone sterilization on a date close to that of their counterpart cases. 9 cases were omitted. All of the remaining 29 triplets were sterilized at least 6 weeks after termination of their last pregnancy. There were no statistically significant differences between cases and controls as to the following characteristics: race; age; parity; type of termination of last pregnancy; history of abdominal and pelvic operations; preexisting phase when sterilization was performed. 20 of the 29 cases and 21 of the 58 controls had an interval between termination of last pregnancy and date of sterilization of less than 1 year; the difference was statistically significant. Patients with an interval of less than 1 year were 4.8 times more likely to incur uterine perforation.

Keywords

Laparotomy, Uterine Rupture, Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tubal, Uterine Perforation, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?