Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 1953 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The short umbilical cord

Authors: Robert H. Rosen;

The short umbilical cord

Abstract

Abstract 1. 1. During the 12 month period from July 1, 1948, to June 30, 1949, there were 1,525 deliveries at the Brooklyn Womens Hospital. Of these, 269 presented the complication of the short umbilical cord, an incidence of 17.6 per cent. 2. 2. There was no significant increase in the duration of the first or second stage of labor. 3. 3. There was no difference in the types of deliveries in the study group as compared to the control group, i.e., no added operative interference was required. 4. 4. The type of anesthesia used played no part in the outcome of the cases. A suggestion regarding the use of continuous caudal and low spinal analgesia is made. 5. 5. The incidence of fetal distress and the need for resuscitation of the newborn are increased in the “short cord” group of cases. 6. 6. Shortening of the umbilical cord does not seem to be a major contributing cause of stillbirth.

Keywords

Pregnancy Complications, Asphyxia Neonatorum, Pregnancy, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Female, Obstetric Labor Complications, Umbilical Cord

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?