Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The American Journal...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The American Journal of Cardiology
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Reoperation for coarctation of the aorta

Authors: Beekman III, Robert H.; Rocchini, Albert P.; Behrendt, Douglas M.; Rosenthal, Amnon;

Reoperation for coarctation of the aorta

Abstract

Between 1957 and 1980 reoperation for coarctation of the aorta was performed in 21 patients at one institution for an overall incidence rate of 7.9 percent. The incidence rate of reoperation was 38 percent for patients younger than age 3 years and 1.5 percent for patients 3 years or older at initial repair. Before reoperation 14 of the 21 patients were symptomatic, 19 had systolic hypertension of the upper limbs and 20 had a documented coarctation pressure gradient at rest (mean 42.4 mm Hg). Surgical techniques used at reoperation were patch aortoplasty in 12 patients, graft interposition in 4, end to end anastomosis in 3 and end to side left subclavian to descending aorta bypass graft in 2. There was one surgical death. The 20 survivors have been followed up a mean of 4.3 years. There has been significant symptomatic improvement (p < 0.001). Upper limb hypertension has also lessened significantly (p < 0.001) after reoperation;15 patients are no longer hypertensive and 3 have a lesser degree of hypertension. The coarctation pressure gradient at rest has significantly decreased (p < 0.001); 13 patients have no residual gradient and 7 have a mild gradient of 20 mm Hg or less. Graded treadmill exercise testing performed in five patients after reoperation documented upper limb hypertension in four and a marked increase in coarctation gradient with exercise in three. In conclusion, the incidence of reoperation is significantly increased in patients who are younger than age 3 years at initial coarctation repair. Reoperation is a safe and effective procedure. It has a low mortality rate (4.8 percent), relieves symptoms and decreases hypertension and the coarctation pressure gradient. Patch aortoplasty appears to be the operative procedure of choice. Moderate to severe hemodynamic abnormalities may persist during exercise after reoperation for coarctation of the aorta.

Keywords

Adult, Time Factors, Adolescent, Systole, Headache, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Intermittent Claudication, Aortography, Aortic Coarctation, Recurrence, Child, Preschool, Internal Medicine and Specialties, Health Sciences, Hypertension, Exercise Test, Humans, Coronary Artery Bypass, Child, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    109
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
109
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
bronze