
pmid: 4546975
Abstract Fifty cardiac catheterizations were performed in 44 patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease. Ventricular function curves (VFC) were constructed by plotting the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and stroke work index (SWI) before and three to four minutes after a standard left ventricular angiogram. In an attempt to delineate the mechanism that produces changes in the post-angiogram LVEDP and SWI, 13 individuals (Group A) with no evidence of cardiac disease were compared to 14 patients with severe coronary artery disease (Group B). Cardiac output and LVEDP increased in both groups after angiogram. The increase in cardiac output was less and the increase in LVEDP greater in Group B. V max. did not change significantly after angiogram in either group. Other measures of contractility (dpdt max., peak Vce, and dp/dt/40 mm. developed pressure) changed appropriately for the large changes in preload seen after angiogram. Thirty-seven studies in patients with coronary artery disease demonstrated that VFC obtained from the cardiac response to contrast are more sensitive than resting LVEDP or ejection fraction in detecting left ventricular abnormality. VFC can be obtained from the ventricular response to angiographic contrast because of the increase in venous return produced by the hyperosmotic effect of contrast. Depressed curves occur in patients with coronary artery disease because of their stiff ventricles and not because of depression of myocardial contractility.
Cardiac Catheterization, Heart Ventricles, Cineangiography, Contrast Media, Humans, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Cardiac Output, Coronary Artery Bypass, Diatrizoate
Cardiac Catheterization, Heart Ventricles, Cineangiography, Contrast Media, Humans, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Cardiac Output, Coronary Artery Bypass, Diatrizoate
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
