Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Heart Journ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Heart Journal
Article . 1955 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Bilateral bundle branch block

Authors: Eugene Lepeschkin; Mauricio B. Rosenbaum;

Bilateral bundle branch block

Abstract

Abstract 1. 1. An electrocardiographic diagnosis of bilateral bundle branch block can be made in rare instances in which conduction in the branches is not completely interrupted and the degree of block in one of the branches is less than in the other on some occasions and greater on others; this allows the patterns of right and left bundle branch block to appear alternately or intermittently in the same patient, accompanied by changes of P-R. Two personal cases of this sort are reported and seven similar observations from the literature are discussed. 2. 2. While the incidence of bilateral bundle branch block in which this condition can be definitely proved is very small, the great incidence of unilateral bundle branch block makes it probable that many cases of complete A-V block, attributed to a conduction disturbance in the A-V node or the common stem of the bundle, are in reality caused by bilateral bundle branch block. 3. 3. In seven of the nine cases of definite bilateral bundle branch block, alternation of the right and left bundle branch block patterns was present at some time. The most probable explanation of this was considered to be 2:1 block in one of the branches in the presence of a constant prolongation of conduction in the other branch. 4. 4. Conduction in the branches behaves in the same way as in the rest of the A-V conduction system. In one of the cases (No. 1), all the possible forms of impaired conduction were demonstrated to be present in the left branch of the His bundle (simple prolonged conduction time, Wenckebach periods, 2:1 and 3:1 block, and transient complete interruption of conduction). 5. 5. True bilateral bundle branch block must necessarily prolong the A-V conduction time. The form of the ventricular complex is determined by the branch with the greater degree of block, while the conduction delay in the branch in which the block is less important determines the lengthening of the P-R interval. This must be so because the stimulus reaches the ventricules through the less affected branch. 6. 6. In true bilateral bundle branch block the intrinsicoid deflection of the ventricular complex is delayed only on the side of the chest corresponding to the more affected branch and is within normal limits on the opposite side. Cases in which the intrinsicoid deflection is delayed over both ventricles probably represent an association of true bundle branch block with an intraparietal conduction disturbance of the contralateral ventricle.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Heart Block, Cardiovascular Diseases, Bundle-Branch Block, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    118
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
118
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!