
AbstractThis paper addresses the economic lot and delivery scheduling problem (ELDSP) within three-echelon supply chains, focusing on the complexities of demand uncertainty, limited shelf-life of products, and sequence-dependency of setups. We develop a novel mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model for a supply chain comprising one supplier, multiple manufacturers with flexible flow shop (FFS) production systems, and multiple retailers, all operating over a finite planning horizon. The common cycle (CC) strategy is adopted as the synchronization policy. Our model employs fuzzy set theory, particularly the “Me measure,” to effectively handle the retailers’ demand uncertainty. Our findings indicate that total supply chain costs escalate with an increase in demand, final components’ holding costs, and sequence-dependent setup costs, but decrease with increasing production rates. Furthermore, while total costs are significantly sensitive to changes in demand, they are relatively insensitive to fluctuations in sequence-dependent setup times. The models developed offer valuable managerial insights for optimizing costs in synchronized multi-stage supply chains, aiding managers in making informed decisions about production lot sizes and delivery schedules under both deterministic and fuzzy demand scenarios. Additionally, the proposed models bridge key research gaps and provide robust decision-making tools for cost optimization, enhancing supply chain synchronization in practical settings.
Flexible flow shop (FFS), Electronic computers. Computer science, Economic lot and delivery scheduling problem (ELDSP), Me measure, Sequence-dependent setups, QA75.5-76.95, Information technology, T58.5-58.64, Fuzzy demand
Flexible flow shop (FFS), Electronic computers. Computer science, Economic lot and delivery scheduling problem (ELDSP), Me measure, Sequence-dependent setups, QA75.5-76.95, Information technology, T58.5-58.64, Fuzzy demand
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
