
Best practices for the publication of Semantic Web data currently place an unacceptably high burden on the end-user, who is supposed to locate and embrace third-party, ontological structures prior to publishing any information. This paper argues for a different publication paradigm where end-users are encouraged to publish potentially incomplete or conflicting information according to their own local context, and where heterogeneous data is consolidated a posteriori through bottom–up, decentralized processes. This approach has two key advantages: first, it greatly simplifies the publication of semantic information by allowing users to contribute purely local data, without any consideration for global schemas or third-party structures. Second, it takes advantage of expressive, semantic links to relate both schemas and instances, creating complex webs of knowledge where cultural or social differences can flourish and be confronted one another.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
