
Abstract Purpose The introduction of novel endoscopic instruments is essential to reduce trauma in visceral surgery. However, endoscopic device development is hampered by challenges in respecting the dimensional restrictions, due to the narrow access route, and by achieving adequate force transmission. As the overall goal of our research is the development of a patient adaptable, endoscopic anastomosis manipulator, biomechanical and size-related characterization of gastrointestinal organs are needed to determine technical requirements and thresholds to define functional design and load-compatible dimensioning of devices. Methods We built an experimental setup to measure colon tissue compression piercing forces. We tested 54 parameter sets, including variations of three tissue fixation configurations, three piercing body configurations (four, eight, twelve spikes) and insertion trajectories of constant velocities (5 mms−1, 10 mms−1,15 mms−1) and constant accelerations (5 mms−2, 10 mms−2, 15 mms−2) each in 5 samples. Furthermore, anatomical parameters (lumen diameter, tissue thickness) were recorded. Results There was no statistically significant difference in insertion forces neither between the trajectory groups, nor for variation of tissue fixation configurations. However, we observed a statistically significant increase in insertion forces for increasing number of spikes. The maximum mean peak forces for four, eight and twelve spikes were 6.4 ± 1.5 N, 13.6 ± 1.4 N and 21.7 ± 5.8 N, respectively. The 5th percentile of specimen lumen diameters and pierced tissue thickness were 24.1 mm and 2.8 mm, and the 95th percentiles 40.1 mm and 4.8 mm, respectively. Conclusion The setup enabled reliable biomechanical characterization of colon material, on the base of which design specifications for an endoscopic anastomosis device were derived. The axial implant closure unit must enable axial force transmission of at least 28 N (22 ± 6 N). Implant and applicator diameters must cover a range between 24 and 40 mm, and the implant gap, compressing anastomosed tissue, between 2 and 5 mm.
Swine, Anastomosis, Surgical, Rectum, Colonoscopy/methods [MeSH] ; Swine [MeSH] ; Pressure [MeSH] ; Rectum/surgery [MeSH] ; Colon ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Biomechanical Phenomena [MeSH] ; Forces ; Colorectal Neoplasms/physiopathology [MeSH] ; Animals [MeSH] ; Original Article ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods [MeSH] ; Implants ; Neoplasms, Experimental [MeSH] ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods [MeSH] ; Anastomosis ; Endoscopy ; Piercing, Colonoscopy, Neoplasms, Experimental, Biomechanical Phenomena, Pressure, Animals, Original Article, Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, ddc: ddc:
Swine, Anastomosis, Surgical, Rectum, Colonoscopy/methods [MeSH] ; Swine [MeSH] ; Pressure [MeSH] ; Rectum/surgery [MeSH] ; Colon ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Biomechanical Phenomena [MeSH] ; Forces ; Colorectal Neoplasms/physiopathology [MeSH] ; Animals [MeSH] ; Original Article ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods [MeSH] ; Implants ; Neoplasms, Experimental [MeSH] ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods [MeSH] ; Anastomosis ; Endoscopy ; Piercing, Colonoscopy, Neoplasms, Experimental, Biomechanical Phenomena, Pressure, Animals, Original Article, Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, ddc: ddc:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
