Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Soils and...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Waste or resource? Classifying and scoring dredged material management strategies in terms of the waste hierarchy

Authors: Sabine Elisabeth Apitz;

Waste or resource? Classifying and scoring dredged material management strategies in terms of the waste hierarchy

Abstract

A well-designed approach for the selection of dredged material (DM) management option decisions identifies the trade-offs among various risks, costs, and benefits of multiple management alternatives. Whatever tools are applied to make and communicate decisions, it is critical that decision criteria and the parameters or indicators that are used to score or rank them are relevant, clear, and exhaustive, but not redundant. Alongside the more “traditional” ones, new criteria are emerging which consider statutory drivers, multi-scale assessments, sustainability and ecosystem issues. Increasingly, policies demand more sustainable sediment management (including a prioritization of beneficial re-use), waste minimization, and a consideration of the waste hierarchy. A consideration of such factors requires that DM management approaches are classified in terms of the waste hierarchy and that these classifications are used to develop transparent and meaningful indicators, criteria, and scoring methods that can be used to inform decisions. Waste hierarchy classifications and definitions (pollution prevention, processing, re-use, recycling, and disposal), are discussed and a framework for DM management option and technology classification is proposed. Methodologies are presented by which complete management scenarios, with multiple phases or components, can be ranked and scored based upon the fates of all project fractions in terms of the waste hierarchy. A hypothetical case study is presented in which 15 DM management scenarios are evaluated using two scoring systems. These had different strengths and weaknesses, but both allowed for consistent and transparent comparisons of complex DM management scenarios in terms of the waste hierarchy that could be used for project comparison and communication. The goal of any indicator or score designed to represent a decision criterion is to provide a relative measure to allow decision makers and stakeholders to balance potentially competing decision drivers for potentially vastly different management scenarios in a level, consistent and transparent manner. As the waste hierarchy is likely to become increasingly important as a regulatory driver, and as a factor that can be used to address sustainability, it is important to be clear about the assumptions and definitions that are being used to make these concepts relevant to DM and other aspects of sediment management; this paper provides a framework for discussion.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!