
This paper presents the results of two studies carried out in order to design and test a self-report instrument to measure Self-Management Ability (the SMAS-30) in aging individuals. SMA refers to the core behavioral and cognitive abilities which presumably contribute to sustainable well-being in later life. Robust findings of the studies (n = 275 and n = 1338) showed that SMA could be measured reliably as a composite concept of abilities systematically linked to dimensions of well-being in adults aged 65 and over, with the different sub-scales revealing a profile of inter-related abilities. A sub-sample of participants in Study 2 (n = 86) showed that the SMAS-30 had high reproducibility over a period of 16 weeks. The validity of the SMAS-30 was supported by meaningful associations with other constructs in both studies. As expected, the older and frailer the people, and the poorer their perceived health, the lower their SMA. Moreover, SMA was positively related to several dimensions of subjective well-being and the related concepts of general self-efficacy and mastery.
SELECTION, self-management, Self Disclosure, STRATEGIES, SATISFACTION, IMPACT, ADULTHOOD, Personal Satisfaction, LIFE-MANAGEMENT, Surveys and Questionnaires, questionnaire design, Humans, OPTIMIZATION, Aged, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, FRAMEWORK, Self Efficacy, Self Care, aged, COMPENSATION, quality of life, OSTEOARTHRITIS, Quality of Life
SELECTION, self-management, Self Disclosure, STRATEGIES, SATISFACTION, IMPACT, ADULTHOOD, Personal Satisfaction, LIFE-MANAGEMENT, Surveys and Questionnaires, questionnaire design, Humans, OPTIMIZATION, Aged, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, FRAMEWORK, Self Efficacy, Self Care, aged, COMPENSATION, quality of life, OSTEOARTHRITIS, Quality of Life
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 122 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
