
handle: 11390/1233785
Research in the application of quantum structures to cognitive science confirms that these structures quite systematically appear in the dynamics of concepts and their combinations and quantum-based models faithfully represent experimental data of situations where classical approaches are problematical. In this paper, we analyze the data we collected in an experiment on a specific conceptual combination, showing that Bell's inequalities are violated in the experiment. We present a new refined entanglement scheme to model these data within standard quantum theory rules, where 'entangled measurements and entangled evolutions' occur, in addition to the expected 'entangled states', and present a full quantum representation in complex Hilbert space of the data. This stronger form of entanglement in measurements and evolutions might have relevant applications in the foundations of quantum theory, as well as in the interpretation of nonlocality tests. It could indeed explain some non-negligible 'anomalies' identified in EPR-Bell experiments.
16 pages, no figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations, quantum cognition, EPR-Bell experiments, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations, Bell inequalities, entanglement, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Computation and Language (cs.CL)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum Physics, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations, quantum cognition, EPR-Bell experiments, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations, Bell inequalities, entanglement, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Computation and Language (cs.CL)
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
