
AbstractThis study investigates whether audit partner gender is associated with the extent of auditor disclosure and the communication style regarding risks of material misstatements that are classified as key audit matters (KAMs). Using a sample of UK firms during the 2013–2017 period, our results suggest that female audit partners are more likely than male audit partners to disclose more KAMs with more details after controlling for both client and audit firm attributes. Furthermore, female audit partners are found to use a less optimistic tone and provide less readable audit reports, compared to their male counterparts, suggesting that behavioural variances between female and male audit partners may have significant implications on their writing style. Therefore, this study offers new insights on the role of audit partner gender in extended audit reporting. Our findings have important implications for audit firms, investors, policymakers and governments in relation to the development, implementation and enforcement of gender diversity.
key audit matters, Extended audit reporting, Tone, 330, CAH17-01-08 - accounting, Key audit matters, 650, Readability, /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/accounting, Auditor gender, extended audit reporting, tone, gender differences, CAH17-01-02 - business studies, Accounting, readability, Gender differences, auditor gender, UK
key audit matters, Extended audit reporting, Tone, 330, CAH17-01-08 - accounting, Key audit matters, 650, Readability, /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/accounting, Auditor gender, extended audit reporting, tone, gender differences, CAH17-01-02 - business studies, Accounting, readability, Gender differences, auditor gender, UK
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 100 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
