Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Limnologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Limnology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors affecting bacterial abundance in Lake Biwa: an empirical analysis

Authors: T. B. Gurung; M. Kagami; T. Yoshida; J. Urabe;

Relative importance of biotic and abiotic factors affecting bacterial abundance in Lake Biwa: an empirical analysis

Abstract

To determine the relative importance of factors affecting bacterial abundance in Lake Biwa, correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed with relevant biotic and abiotic variables. Data used in the analyses were collected weekly from April 1997 to June 1998 at a pelagic site in the north basin. The bacterial abundance ranged from 1 to 7 × 106 cells ml−1, and its spatio-temporal pattern was virtually identical to that in previous studies conducted 12–15 years ago. In the surface layer (0–12.5 m), bacterial abundance was significantly correlated with water temperature and with protozoan and metazoan grazers, but not with chlorophyll a and nutrient concentrations. The results suggest that loss factors rather than growth factors are more important in determining bacterial abundance in this lake. However, grazing effects on bacterial abundance differed among zooplankton. Bacterial abundance correlated negatively with phagotrophic nanoflagellates (PNF) and Daphnia, but positively with Eodiaptomus. Thus, PNF and Daphnia act to reduce the bacterial abundance, while Eodiaptomus acts to stimulate. In contrast, these biotic factors did not explain changes in bacterial abundance in the middle (12.5–25 m) and deep (>25 m) layers. Instead, the bacterial abundance in the deep layer was highly correlated with vertical mixing regimes, suggesting that bacterial abundance was directly or indirectly affected by abiotic factors. These results indicate that bacterial abundance in Lake Biwa was regulated by different factors at different depths.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!