Views provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 12624716
handle: 11390/1113977 , 11380/1205881 , 11573/503962 , 11567/1099665 , 11568/79846
We assessed the validity of an Italian language version of the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). The translated ESS was compared to the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Within the context of a multicentric national study on narcolepsy (Gruppo Italiano Narcolessia Studio Epidemiologico Nazionale, GINSEN) involving 17 Italian sleep centres, we compared the two diagnostic tests on 91 prospectively recruited subjects with suspected EDS (34 with narcolepsy, 16 with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, 19 with idiopathic hypersomnia, and 22 with other sleep, neurologic or psychiatric disorders). ESS scores were inversely correlated with mean sleep latency values, as measured with MSLT (rho = -0.31, p<0.01). ESS cut-off scores with best sensitivity and specificity were 12 and 17. For the 5-min MSLT cut-off, sensitivity was 87% and 47% respectively; specificity 39% and 74%. For the 8-min MSLT cut-off, sensitivity was 84% and 49%; specificity 50% and 88%. The Italian version of the ESS is an easy-to-use form useful for preliminary screening of daytime sleepiness level in specialist settings.
Adult, Male, Epworth sleepiness scale; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Multiple sleep latency test; Questionnaires validation; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity, Adolescent, Polysomnography, epworth sleepiness scale; excessive daytime sleepiness; multiple sleep latency test; questionnaires validation; roc curve; sensitivity; specificity, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Middle Aged, Italy, ROC Curve, Epworth sleepiness scale; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Multiple sleep latency test; Questionnaires validation; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity;, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Epworth sleepiness scale; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Multiple sleep latency test; Questionnaires validation; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Polysomnography; ROC Curve; Sleep; Wakefulness; Surveys and Questionnaires; 2708; Neurology (clinical); Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wakefulness, Sleep, Aged
Adult, Male, Epworth sleepiness scale; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Multiple sleep latency test; Questionnaires validation; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity, Adolescent, Polysomnography, epworth sleepiness scale; excessive daytime sleepiness; multiple sleep latency test; questionnaires validation; roc curve; sensitivity; specificity, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Middle Aged, Italy, ROC Curve, Epworth sleepiness scale; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Multiple sleep latency test; Questionnaires validation; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity;, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Epworth sleepiness scale; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Multiple sleep latency test; Questionnaires validation; ROC curve; Sensitivity; Specificity; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Polysomnography; ROC Curve; Sleep; Wakefulness; Surveys and Questionnaires; 2708; Neurology (clinical); Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wakefulness, Sleep, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 345 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 109 |

Views provided by UsageCounts