
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 25008158
Somatic mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) are strongly associated with pathological subtypes, genetic profiles, and clinical features in gliomas. The IDH1/2 status is currently regarded as one of the most important molecular markers in gliomas and should be assessed accurately and robustly. However, the methods used for IDH1/2 testing are not fully standardized. The purpose of this paper is to review the clinical significance of IDH1/2 mutations and the methods used for IDH1/2 testing. The optimal method for IDH1/2 testing varies depending on a number of factors, including the purpose, sample types, sample number, or laboratory equipment. It is therefore important to acknowledge the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
Genetic Markers, Glioma, Prognosis, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mutation, Humans, Genetic Testing, Sequence Analysis, Genetic Association Studies
Genetic Markers, Glioma, Prognosis, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mutation, Humans, Genetic Testing, Sequence Analysis, Genetic Association Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
