Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Acta Neurochirurgicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Acta Neurochirurgica
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Central Lumbar Disc Herniation

Authors: C B, Bärlocher; J K, Krauss; R W, Seiler;

Central Lumbar Disc Herniation

Abstract

A follow-up study which describes the experience of the Department of Neurosurgery in Berne in the treatment of patients with central lumbar disc herniation (CLDH).The anatomical position of lumbar disc herniation, in general, does not seem to affect postoperative outcome. However, according to other studies a subgroup of patients with central lumbar disc herniations appears to have poorer results.The aim of the present study was to assess clinical outcome in a recent cohort of patients, to investigate whether there is a difference in outcome with regard to the surgical approach (unilateral vs bilateral) and to compare the postoperative results between the subcategories of CLDH: central massprolaps (CMP) and central contained disc herniation (CCDH).Between 1990 and 1997, 40 out of 3150 patients operated on for lumbar disc herniation were diagnosed with CLDH (1.2%). The patients were operated on through unilateral or bilateral fenestrations with microdiscectomy. Recent follow-up studies were obtained by standardized questionnaires. The retrospective investigation was performed by an unbiased observer.Long-term follow-up was available for 34 of the 40 patients (85%) at a mean of 3.3 years. Eight patients had an excellent result (24%), 15 patients a good result (44%), 8 patients a fair (24%) and 3 patients had a poor result (9%). Overall, the operation was considered successful in 68% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome in patients with CMP as compared with those with CCDH (75% versus 64%). There was also no significant difference for better outcome between bilateral as compared with unilateral approaches.Postoperative outcome of central lumbar disc herniation (CLDH) is poorer as compared with other types of lumbar disc herniation. The reason seems to be the anatomical position of the disc herniation with a peculiar derangement of the disc architecture. The surgical approach itself or the subcategories of CLDH appear to have only minor impact on postoperative outcome. Interlaminar fenestrations, in general, are appropriate for removal of the disc fragments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Lumbar Vertebrae, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!