Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Spine Journ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Spine Journal
Article . 1998 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The stability of bone screws in the os sacrum

Authors: A, von Strempel; S, Trenkmann; I, Krönauer; L, Kirsch; C, Sukopp;

The stability of bone screws in the os sacrum

Abstract

A variety of points of insertion and implantation techniques are recommended for inserting screws into the os sacrum. On the basis of 16 complete human sacrum specimens the following axial pull-out tests were performed: 1. Insertion of convergent measuring screws, 6.0 mm and 7.0 mm in outside diameter respectively, into the body of vertebra S1 using a monocortical and bicortical technique respectively with perforation of the ventral cortex. 2. Insertion of divergent screws into the ala sacralis at the level of S1 with 6-mm and 7 mm screws respectively, using a monocortical technique without perforation of the ventral cortex. 3. Insertion of convergent 6-mm screws into the body of vertebra S2 using a monocortical and bicortical technique respectively with perforation of the ventral cortex. The highest axial pull-out force was reached using convergent 6-mm screws inserted into the body of vertebra S1 using the bicortical technique with perforation of the ventral cortex (2392.4 N). The use of a 7.0-mm screw in the same implantation technique did not result in higher pull-out forces (2274.7 N). The monocortical technique reached a pull-out force of 1657.53 N with a 6-mm screw and 1505.64 N with a 7-mm screw. Convergent insertion of 6-mm screws into the body of S2 resulted in pull-out forces of 537.02 N using a bicortical and only 297.71 N using a monocortical technique. Divergent insertion of screws into the ala sacralis reached a maximal pull-out force of 495.47 N using 6-mm screws and 449.79 N using 7-mm screws. These data resulted from a monocortical implantation technique without perforation of the ventral cortex of the ala sacralis. The results of the present biomechanical study show that convergent bicortical implantation in the body of S1 is the most stable technique for screw fixation in the sacrum. The use of 7-mm rather than 6-mm screws did not lead to increased primary stability. Anatomic studies have shown that a safe area exists in the region of the ventral promontory, so this implantation technique appears to be unobjectionable.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Sacrum, Bone Screws, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, Materials Testing, Medical Illustration, Cadaver, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
bronze