descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 26 Nov 2012 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Journal of Anesthesia, volume 27, pages 412-422 (issn: 0913-8668, eissn: 1438-8359,

Authors: Guilherme, Holck; William, Camann;

doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1518-z

pmid: 23184158

Controversies in obstetric anesthesia

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Obstetric anesthesia has become a widely evidence-based practice, with an increasing number of specialized anesthesiologists and a permanent research production. We believe that with the review of commonly discussed and controversial points the reader will be able to incorporate an evidence-based practice into their routine and offer to parturients and their babies a safe, reliable and consistent anesthesia care.

Related Organizations

Harvard University
United States
Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital
United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
United States

Keywords

Pregnancy, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average