
pmid: 33404807
Cancer care-related out-of-pocket expenses and financial toxicity (FT) are a rising burden for patients. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported FT and to identify relevant correlates within a Tunisian population.We conducted a survey using the 11-item Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) that could range from 0 = high to 44 = low. FT was grade 0 if ≥ 26, grade 1 = (14-25), grade 2 = (1-13), and grade 3 = 0. Scores were collected along with data regarding patient medical/social features and out-of-pocket expenses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with higher financial burden.Among the 179 participants, median COST score was 20.8 (Q1 17-Q3 24), with 80.4% of patients experiencing financial toxicity: grade 0 = 20%, grade 1 = 68.4%, grade 2 = 11.7%, grade 3 = 0%. Most patients (66.5%) used to work before cancer and 44.7% reported ceasing work because of cancer. The time to go to the hospital was > 30 min in 66.5% of cases. Unemployment, time to hospital > 30 min, ceasing work because of cancer, and expenses on non-chemotherapy drugs exceeding 70 dinars (25 US dollars) were mostly associated with higher FT on univariate analysis. Distance to hospital and ceasing work because of cancer were the single most significant factors in multivariate analysis.Losing work due to cancer and unequal distribution of health care particularly in cities with long travel times to the nearest hospital are the main sources of financial distress.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Tunisia, Patients, Financial Stress, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cost of Illness, Unemployment, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Health Expenditures, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Tunisia, Patients, Financial Stress, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cost of Illness, Unemployment, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Health Expenditures, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
