Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Surgical Endoscopyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Surgical Endoscopy
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) for decompression in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Initial experience with palliative treatment of gastrointestinal obstruction in terminally ill patients with advanced carcinomas
Authors: H, Scheidbach; T, Horbach; H, Groitl; W, Hohenberger;

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) for decompression in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Abstract

Signs of gastrointestinal obstruction, with intractable vomiting and an inability to take oral food, are common symptoms in terminally ill cancer patients with advanced primary tumors or peritoneal carcinomatosis. The application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) instead of the usual nasoenteral tube is a simple method of achieving permanent decompression in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The goals of this study, in addition to establishing indications and outcome, were to identify specific aspects of tube placement and to determine the incidence of complications.Over a period of 3 years, a total of 24 consecutive patients (mean age, 64 years; range, 37-83 years) underwent either a PEG (17/71%) or a PEJ (seven/29%).In all patients, PEG/PEJ obviated the need for the nasoenteral tube. A total of 22 patients (92%) were enabled to take liquids orally, and 20 (83%) were discharged to home care. With the exception of a single spontaneous dislodgement of the PEG tube, no major complications were observed.We believe that PEG/PEJ represents an effective, minimally invasive, and cost-effective method for gastrointestinal decompression in patients with advanced incurable cancer.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Gastrostomy, Male, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Palliative Care, Jejunostomy, Middle Aged, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Abdominal Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Intestinal Obstruction, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    50
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
50
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!