
pmid: 19562378
Ticks are hematophagous arthropods transmitting several harmful human and animal pathogens like viruses, Rickettsia, bacteria, and protozoa. The identification and speciation of ticks were normally performed in Iran using identification key of Arthur (1960) and Kaiser and Hoogstraal (J Parasitol 49:130-139, 1963) or on the basis of morphological characteristic keys recommended by Walker et al. (2003). Although these identification keys are well prepared, but there are in some cases due to the strong overlapping characteristics between species like Dermacentor marginatus and Dermacentor niveus accompanied with serious problems. D. marginatus and D. niveus have been intermittently used synonymously and there is no a generally agreement with the specification of these species. To find out more about these two species, we have analyzed the complete nucleotide sequence of ITS-2 region. Interestingly, we found indeed a sequence homology of 99% between nucleotide sequence of ITS-2 region of D. marginatus and D. niveus. Since the nucleotide sequence of ITS-2 region of D. marginatus in Iran has 98% sequence homology to the other in GenBank registered ITS-2 sequence of D. marginatus, and the morphological characteristics between both examined species showed minimal differences, therefore we believe that the D. marginatus and D. niveus could belong to the same species and 1% differences in nucleotide sequence of ITS-2 region between these two species can be understand as an intra-species polymorphism.
Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Iran, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Animals, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Dermacentor
Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Iran, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Animals, Humans, Sequence Alignment, Dermacentor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
