Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Langenbeck s Archive...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lymph-node dissection in breast cancer

Authors: A, Bembenek; P M, Schlag;

Lymph-node dissection in breast cancer

Abstract

Along with the ongoing modifications in treatment of primary breast cancer, the purpose and extent of lymph-node dissection has changed. The following is an overview of the current knowledge and practice of lymph-node dissection in breast cancer, with special regard to expected developments in the near future. Axillary dissection is described as a ten-step procedure, including dissection of level-I and -II and Rotter's nodes, without level-III nodes, providing at least ten lymph nodes for accurate staging information.Axillary dissection still offers the most efficient local control in node-positive patients, whereas, in primarily node-negative patients, irradiation seems to be equally effective. In general, lymph-node dissection does not alter overall survival but there is no doubt that surgical therapy still contributes to cure in early-breast-cancer patients and seems to be curative for certain patients with stage-I carcinoma. The lymph node status of the axilla is crucial for the indication of adjuvant therapy in early invasive breast cancer, but an increasing number of clinical node-negative patients could be managed with information based on features of the primary tumor, regardless of the nodal status. The most promising new concept for the selection of node-positive patients, while avoiding unnecessary morbidity of axillary dissection in early-breast-cancer patients, is the sentinel-node concept. The principle is based on the identification of the first "sentinel" lymph node reached by lymphatic flow. Thus, only proven node-positive patients undergo axillary dissection. Local failure of internal mammary lymph nodes is rarely recognized; however, internal mammary lymph nodes seem to have an underestimated prognostic significance in about 10-20% of axillary node-negative patients. This may lead to the withholding of systemic therapy for patients with early breast cancer. Nevertheless, there is no indication for a routine parasternal dissection today. The sentinel-node concept may also support the selection of diagnostic internal lymph-node biopsy and subsequent adjuvant therapy in cases with no axillary lymph-node metastases but with internal lymph-node metastases.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Lymph Nodes, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!