
pmid: 8891790
Induction of cancer by inorganic arsenic occurs inconsistently between species and between routes of exposure, and it exhibits different dose-response relationships between different target organs. Inhaled or ingested arsenic causes cancer in humans but not in other species. Inhaled arsenic primarily induces lung cancer, whereas ingested arsenic induces cancer at multiple sites, including the skin and various other organs. Cancer potency appears to vary by route of exposure (ingestion or inhalation) and by organ site, and increases markedly at higher exposures in some instances. To understand what might explain these inconsistencies, we reviewed several hypotheses about the mechanism of cancer induction by arsenic. Arsenic disposition does not provide satisfactory explanations. Induction of cell proliferation by arsenic is a mechanism of carcinogenesis that is biologically plausible and compatible with differential effects for species or differential dose rates for organ sites. The presence of other carcinogens, or risk modifiers, at levels that correlate with arsenic in drinking water supplies, may be a factor in all three inconsistencies: interspecies specificity, organ sensitivity to route of administration, and organ sensitivity to dose rate.
Male, Skin Neoplasms, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Risk Assessment, Kidney Neoplasms, Arsenic, Survival Rate, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Linear Models, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Water Pollutants, Aged
Male, Skin Neoplasms, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Risk Assessment, Kidney Neoplasms, Arsenic, Survival Rate, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Linear Models, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Water Pollutants, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
