
pmid: 10591990
Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in understanding the latent organisation of the phenomenology of schizophrenia through examination of the fit of dimensional models to observed symptoms date. A group of 66 DSM-IV paranoid schizophrenic in-patients were assessed three times using the SAPS, SANS, BPRS and PAS. The interrelations between individual symptoms of each scale were examined by means of principal component analysis. The results of factor analysis of the findings from SANS and SAPS confirm the three-factor model, composed of a negative, disorganisation and psychotic factor. Extending the range of symptomatology using BPRS resulted in a five-factor model, composed of the following factors: paranoid, negative, affective, cognitive and disorganised behaviour. In view of the findings based on Strauss' work (1974) the PAS has been added to the SANS, SAPS and BPRS, whose results were examined by factor analysis. The findings indicate that it is possible to consider a six-factor model, composed of the following dimensions: paranoid, negative, affective, cognitive, disorganised behaviour and premorbid social adjustment deficits. The number of factors that best reflect the structure of the symptomatology of paranoid schizophrenia depends on the range of the symptoms under study, i.e., on the type of scales. It follows from our study that six-factor model appears to be the most suitable and clear model in rendering the multidimensionality of paranoid schizophrenia phenomenology.
Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Paranoid, Humans, Female, Schizophrenic Psychology, Prospective Studies, Models, Psychological, Factor Analysis, Statistical
Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Paranoid, Humans, Female, Schizophrenic Psychology, Prospective Studies, Models, Psychological, Factor Analysis, Statistical
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
