Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Archives of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Positive surgical margins in cancer of the larynx

Authors: T, Yilmaz; E, Turan; B, Gürsel; M, Onerci; S, Kaya;

Positive surgical margins in cancer of the larynx

Abstract

In order to determine what should be done for laryngeal cancer patients when surgical margins are positive, and to evaluate their prognosis, a retrospective review of 21 laryngeal cancer patients with positive surgical margins out of 714 surgically treated cases (2.9%) was carried out. Nineteen patients were treated with postoperative radiation therapy. Two patients who had had endolaryngeal partial laryngectomy were treated with vertical partial laryngectomy. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Ten patients (10/19; 53%) were recurrence-free. Four patients had local, two had regional, and two had locoregional recurrences. Only one patient with a local recurrence could be salvaged with total laryngectomy and is disease-free. One patient developed liver metastasis. Nineteen patients had a mean and median disease-free survival of 48 and 36 months, respectively. Nine out of fourteen patients (64%) treated curatively were recurrence-free. The patients with positive margins developed significantly more locoregional recurrences than those with free margins (P < 0.05). We conclude that surgical margins must be checked peroperatively with frozen sections to make sure that they are free. The margins of every laryngectomy specimen must be diligently examined. If positive, re-excision, postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy are treatment alternatives. They should not just be managed with close follow-up. However, whatever treatment is applied, the prognosis for patients with positive margins is significantly worse than for those with free margins.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Salvage Therapy, Neoplasm, Residual, Laryngectomy, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Disease-Free Survival, Survival Rate, Humans, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!