Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archives of Gynecolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Serum fructosamine and fructosamine - albumin ratio as screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus

Authors: Bor, M V; Bor, P; Cevik, C;

Serum fructosamine and fructosamine - albumin ratio as screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus

Abstract

To evaluate the role of fructosamine/albumin ratio as an alternative screening parameter for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), serum fructosamine, albumin, protein, fructosamine/albumin ratio, and oral glucose tolerance were measured in 56 non-pregnant control healthy subjects, and in 96 pregnant women who screened positive after a 50 g glucose challenge-test. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) identified 12 of 96 pregnant women as having GDM. Fructosamine concentration of 1.98 +/- 0.32 mmol/L (mean +/- SD) and fructosamine/albumin ratio of 47 +/- 10 mumol/g (mean +/- SD) has been obtained in nonpregnant control subjects. During the second trimester a lower fructosamine level (1.84 +/- 0.29 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and a higher fructosamine/albumin ratio (62 +/- 15 mumol/g, p < 0.001) occurs in pregnant women, when compared to non-pregnant healthy control subjects, most likely due to the low serum albumin concentration (30 +/- 6 g/L). The serum fructosamine levels and fructosamine/albumin ratio were only slightly higher in the pregnant women with GDM than in normal pregnant women (2.05 +/- 0.47 mmol/L versus 1.84 +/- 0.29 mmol/L, 67 +/- 16 mumol/g versus 62 +/- 15 mumol/g, respectively) but the differences were not statistically significant. The fructosamine and fructosamine/albumin ratio values for normal and GDM groups overlapped considerably. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values for fructosamine were 41.7%, 85.7%, 29.4% and 91%, and for fructosamine/albumin ratio 25%, 79.8%, 15% and 88% respectively. This suggests that both fructosamine and fructosamine/albumin ratio have low sensitivity as predictors of GDM and can therefore not be used as screening tests.

Countries
Denmark, Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes, Second, Glucose Tolerance Test, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diabetes, Gestational, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Gestational, Fructosamine, Humans, Mass Screening, False Positive Reactions, Female, Pregnancy Trimester, Serum Albumin

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!