Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Simple rectovaginal fistulas

Authors: M K, Baig; R H, Zhao; C H, Yuen; J J, Nogueras; J J, Singh; E G, Weiss; S D, Wexner;

Simple rectovaginal fistulas

Abstract

In regard to the causes of simple rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) we examined the methods of diagnosis and the efficacy and outcome of surgical procedures. The study included all of our patients diagnosed with simple RVF between December 1988 and July 1998 (n = 19). Medical charts of these patients were reviewed regarding diagnostic investigations, operative procedure, outcome, and follow-up. The most common cause was obstetric trauma (n = 15, 79%) followed by infection (n = 4, 21%). Eight patients (42%) had undergone anal surgery prior to the development of RVF; two of these had undergone more than one procedure. Endoanal ultrasound was performed in 15 patients and identified the fistula in 11 (73%). A concomitant sphincter injury was visualized in 9 of 15 patients (60%). The most common initial operation performed was an endoanal advancement flap in 12 patients (63%). This operation was performed in combination with a sphincteroplasty in 4 patients, while 3 had sphincteroplasty alone. The mean hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-5). Postoperative morbidity was noted in 5 patients (26%) of and consisted of recurrent fistula and passage of gas per vagina. Surgery was successful in complete resolution of symptoms in 14 cases (74%). Two of the three recurrences were successfully repaired with a repeat endoanal advancement flap, and one is awaiting repair. The mean follow-up for the entire group was 35.8 months (range 6-84). Endoanal advancement flap should be the initial treatment of choice for simple, low rectovaginal fistulas. The procedure can also be employed with expectations of success even after a failed primary repair and should be combined with sphincteroplasty if a coexistent anteriorly based anal sphincter defect is noted either by clinical examination or endoanal ultrasonography.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Labor, Obstetric, Time Factors, Vaginal Fistula, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Humans, Rectal Fistula, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!