
pmid: 36939905
Pygopagus comprises 17% of all conjoined twin cases. Survival rate is higher compared to other variations of conjoined twins, but separation is a great challenge due to multiorgan involvement. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) used aims to aid operator in preserving as much function as possible.The authors reported 2 pairs of pygopagus separation. Intraoperatively, motor-evoked potential (MEP) and sensory-evoked potential (SEP) were used in all patients. Three patients survived in which all had transient motor deficits. Urinary retention was reported in one patient. One patient died 2 weeks after separation as twins only had one kidney which was spared for the healthier twin.IONM was used to guide operator in dissecting, identify the ownership of the neural structures, and determine the safest point to separate in pygopagus separation. Despite the normal MEP and SEP recordings, transient motor weakness may still occur transiently. The motor tract development of children is achieved in adolescence, making MEP less accurate. However, the reliability of MEP increases when it is combined with SEP. Autonomic function monitoring such as bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) could not be assessed due to the unavailability of the probe.IONM can aid operator in pygopagus separation during determining the origins of the structure, dissecting, and cutting the neural structures. Normal MEP interpretations are still possible to correlate with transient deficits, but reliability can be improved with the use of SEP. In surgeries involving the lower spine level, BCR monitoring is recommended to avoid autonomic deficits.
Adolescent, Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Indonesia, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Child, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Twins, Conjoined, Spine
Adolescent, Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Indonesia, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Child, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Twins, Conjoined, Spine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
