Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Radiologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Radiology
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Speech processing in radiology

Authors: W, Hundt; O, Stark; B, Scharnberg; M, Hold; P, Kohz; A, Lienemann; H, Bonél; +1 Authors

Speech processing in radiology

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the recognition rate, learning potential and amount of time needed to complete a report with the Philips speech recognition system SP 6000 (Philips, Best, The Netherlands). Four radiologists dictated reports of interventional radiology, MRI examinations of the musculoskeletal system and CT examinations of the thorax and abdomen with the Philips system using the German language. The recognition rate of each report and improvement rate after each learning phase of the Philips system was assessed. The time needed to complete a report using the Philips system was then compared with the time needed to complete a report using the tape-based system via a time analysis. The average recognition rate for the four radiologists using the Philips system was 79.6 %, which improved to 92.5 % after the third adaptation. Initially, the average time demand to dictate and correct one report was approximately 16.8 min, but this time decreased to 8.1 min after the third adaptation. In contrast, only 3. 6 min were needed to dictate and correct one report using the tape-based system. However, with the speech recognition system, dictation, correction and transcription of the report can be completed within 15 min, whereas with the tape-based system, it takes nearly 1 day. With the Philips system, speech recognition can reach as high as 95 % since each adaptation of the system improves the recognition rate by approximately 5 %. While the Philips system is associated with longer dictation times than the tape-based system, turn-around time for a complete report is substantially shorter with the Philips system than the tape-based system.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Computer Communication Networks, Radiology Information Systems, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Computer Systems, Tape Recording, Time and Motion Studies, Humans, Radiology, Interventional, Medical Records, Software

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!