
Many efforts and much research have been dedicated to the field of non-invasive angiographic techniques in the past few years. Thanks first to magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and subsequently to computed tomographic angiography (CTA), very interesting results have been obtained in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular diseases. Neck vessels are most successfully evaluated by both MRA and CTA, and the need for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) examinations in patients at risk for vascular occlusions has significantly decreased. The role and the diagnostic accuracy of these non-invasive modalities in intracranial vascular pathology is still under investigation, and several studies have been and are being performed. Both techniques have a better spatial resolution and sensitivity in detecting cerebrovascular malformations than DSA. In the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms, both MRA and CTA - due to their high sensitivity - have become screening techniques in the population at risk for subarachnoid hemorrhage, these techniques may become basic diagnostic modalities in treatment planning. The results are less satisfying in the evaluation of brain arteriovenous malformations and in the different steps of pre- and post-therapeutic evaluation.
Diagnosis, Differential, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Sensitivity and Specificity, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Diagnosis, Differential, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Sensitivity and Specificity, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
