Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao World Journal of Sur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
World Journal of Surgery
Article . 1998 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Colorectal Metastases

Authors: T, Kin; Y, Nakajima; H, Kanehiro; M, Hisanaga; T, Ohyama; K, Nishio; M, Sho; +2 Authors

Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Colorectal Metastases

Abstract

AbstractRecurrence rates after hepatic resection in patients with colorectal metastases are reported to range from 47% to 80%. Hepatic recurrence is seen in 35% to 50% of patients. Aggressive surgical resection appears to be a worthwhile treatment in patients with recurrent hepatic metastases to promote longer patient survival because surgical resection remains the only curative therapy available. This is a retrospective review of our experience with 15 patients undergoing repeat hepatic resection culled from 67 patients undergoing initial hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Of 67 patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal hepatic metastases, 33 developed hepatic recurrence at a median interval of 23 months (range 1–176 months) after the first hepatectomy. The second hepatectomy was performed in 15 patients 5 to 29 months after the first hepatectomy, with no mortality. The mean operating time and blood loss at the second hepatectomy were similar to those at the first hepatectomy. The mean hospital stay at the second hepatectomy was significantly shorter than that at the first hepatectomy. The cumulative survival rate for the 15 patients was 42.4% at 3 years and 21.2% at 5 years, respectively, which compared favorably with the survival rate of the 67 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy. Patients who underwent the second hepatectomy had significantly higher survival rates from the first hepatectomy than the 18 patients with unresectable hepatic recurrence. Repeat hepatectomy can be performed safely and provides long‐term survival rates similar to those of first hepatectomies. In appropriately selected patients, repeat hepatectomy for colorectal metastases is a worthwhile treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Reoperation, Rectal Neoplasms, Patient Selection, Liver Neoplasms, Blood Loss, Surgical, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Hospitalization, Survival Rate, Colonic Neoplasms, Hepatectomy, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Safety, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    61
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
61
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!