Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Aesthetic Plastic Su...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mammographic Findings Following Reduction Mammoplasty

Authors: D, Danikas; S J, Theodorou; G, Kokkalis; K, Vasiou; K, Kyriakopoulou;

Mammographic Findings Following Reduction Mammoplasty

Abstract

Breast reduction mammoplasty is becoming an increasingly common procedure. A baseline mammogram is recommended after 35 years of age as the most effective method for detection of small breast cancers. A prospective study was conducted for the evaluation of the mammographic findings after reduction mammoplasty. During the last 7 years, 113 patients over 35 years of age underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty. All patients had a preoperative mammogram. A new mammogram was obtained at 6 and 18 months after the procedure. All films were reviewed by the same two radiologists. Breast reduction was performed with the vertical bipedicle flap technique (McKissock) and the inferior pedicle technique. There were no apparent differences in the findings between the two methods. Most common findings were parenchymal redistribution in 102 (90.2%) and elevation of the nipple in 96 (84.9%), produced by a shift of the breast tissue to a lower position. Calcifications were seen in 29 (25.6%), and "oil cysts" in 22 (19.4%), caused by localized fat necrosis. A retroareolar fibrotic band was found in 23 (20.3%), from the transposed flap. Areolar thickening was observed in six (5.3%), and skin thickening in only two (1.7%), from scar tissue. Mammographic findings after reduction mammoplasty are predictable, thus preventing unnecessary biopsies and making the diagnosis of lesions unrelated to the procedure easier. All patients over 35 years of age should have a preoperative and a postoperative mammogram for future reference.

Keywords

Adult, Mammaplasty, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Aged, Mammography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    57
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
57
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!