
pmid: 11201035
The objective of the study was to compare two methods (Ranawat's and Pierchon's) used to determine the centre of rotation of the hip and establish which method calculates a position nearer to the real centre of rotation.We selected 24 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip. The centre of rotation of the healthy hip was determined in two consecutive radiographic studies by superimposing a template of circles and using two axes as the reference lines (X-axis=teardrop line; Y-axis=a line perpendicular to the X-axis, drawn from the intersection of the ilio-ischiatic line and the teardrop line). After ensuring the stability of these references, both methods were applied to the same radiograph to determine which one established a centre of rotation nearer to the anatomical centre identified by the template of circles.When the values for the healthy hip are compared with those obtained using Ranawat's method, highly significant differences are observed for both X (P<0.0001) and Y (P<0.0001). When the results for the healthy hip are compared with the values obtained using Pierchon's method, neither the X (P=0.722 ) nor the Y values (P=0.112) show any significant differences. It would be advisable to use Pierchon's method to determine the centre of rotation during the preoperative planning for a total hip arthroplasty when the anatomical alteration is bilateral.
Adult, Male, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Radiography, Reference Values, Humans, Female, Hip Joint, Range of Motion, Articular, Mathematics, Aged
Adult, Male, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Radiography, Reference Values, Humans, Female, Hip Joint, Range of Motion, Articular, Mathematics, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
