
Although there is little doubt that the scapular flap is a versatile flap that is suitable for most tissue defects, it has failed to gain its proper place in the reconstructive armamentarium. This may be due to the perceived donor site morbidity. However, many published articles have shown that the donor site morbidity is limited and acceptable. The scapular free flap is accessible, relatively easy to dissect and has a long vascular pedicle with a constant position of artery and veins. The donor site may be closed primarily for flaps that do not exceed 10 cm in width. It is usually hairless, and is ideal for intermediate-sized defects. There is no functional donor site deficit and the resulting scar is acceptable. No major artery is sacrificed. The independent arc of skin flap rotation relative to the bone component is another major advantage over other flaps. Therefore, I believe that the scapular free flap is a superior and adaptable flap in most skin and/or bone defect reconstructions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
