Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Marine Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Marine Biology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Significance of food type for growth of ephyrae Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa)

Authors: Båmstedt U.; Wild B.; Martinussen M.;

Significance of food type for growth of ephyrae Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa)

Abstract

We studied growth of newly released Aureliaaurita ephyra larvae fed five different food types, including a large-sized copepod, a phytoflagellate, and suspended POM (particulate organic matter) made from bivalve meat. Experiments were run at saturated food concentration in two different temperatures over 10 days. The effect of small differences in temperature was inconsistent and interacted with the effect of food type, which, in turn, was highly significant. A low average growth rate (4–9% day–1) was shown when feeding on the large-sized copepod Calanusfinmarchicus (80 µg AFDW individual–1), in spite of an extremely high daily ration of up to 1500% of body AFDW. When feeding on the cryptophyte Rhodomonasbaltica (ca. 8 µm cell diameter), the ephyrae showed an average growth rate over the 10 day experiment of 7–11%, but with a considerably higher growth rate during the first days. Suspended POM generated an average growth rate of 7–9% day–1, whereas fresh bivalve meat, manually placed into the stomach of the ephyra, gave an average growth rate of 12–14% day–1. Artemia nauplii (ca. 3 µg AFDW individual–1), used as a general reference, resulted in higher growth rates than any of the other food types (17–31% day–1). We conclude that A. aurita ephyrae can capture and feed on phytoplankton, large copepods, and POM; that phytoplankton might be of nutritive significance early in development; and that the high quantity of large-sized copepods ingested is inefficiently converted to growth during early development. POM is a potential food source because of the ability of the ephyrae to encounter and ingest it, although concentration, size distribution, and nutritional composition of natural POM probably constrain its effect on growth.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!