Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ AI & Societyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
AI & Society
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

When AI meets AI: analyzing AI bills using AI

The chamber and partisan effects in U.S. AI Governance
Authors: Heonuk Ha;

When AI meets AI: analyzing AI bills using AI

Abstract

Abstract With the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology and its pervasive integration into society, governments worldwide have introduced a range of AI-related policies. In the United States, the use of AI technology has surged significantly since 2021, driven by the emergence of generative AI and its transformative potential. In response, the U.S. Congress has proposed numerous AI-related bills, reflecting growing legislative engagement with AI governance. This study examines 204 AI-related bills introduced during the 117th and 118th Congresses (2021–2024) through computational text analysis, employing topic modeling to identify recurring legislative themes and sentiment analysis to assess congressional attitudes toward AI policies. The findings reveal distinct variations in legislative focus and tone across chambers and political parties, offering a nuanced understanding of how AI-related issues are framed within U.S. policymaking. In addition, the results highlight how AI is connected to broader opportunities and concerns, including national security, technological innovation, and public service delivery. By applying machine learning techniques to legislative texts, this research provides a systematic and scalable approach to understanding AI policymaking. The study contributes to broader discussions on the partisan and institutional dynamics shaping AI legislation in the United States, offering insights into how emerging technologies are shaped by legislative priorities, regulatory attitudes, and broader political contexts.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid