Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Theoretical and Appl...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of AFLP in Beta

Authors: M. Hansen; T. Kraft; M. Christiansson; N.-O. Nilsson;

Evaluation of AFLP in Beta

Abstract

AFLP markers were evaluated for their usefulness in the genetic analysis of sugarbeet and wild Beta species. Accessions of ten different sugarbeet breeding lines and five wild beets were screened using 256 primer combinations. Of the 11 309 bands investigated, 96.4% were polymorphic among the accessions. A strong positive correlation was found between the number of polymorphisms and AT content of the selective bases of the primer combinations. Random subsets of primer combinations were used to produce genetic distance trees. Permutation tests showed that, for the wild beets, 500 AFLP bands sufficed to obtain the best topology of the tree with a probability at any given node of more than 99%. Ten times as many bands were necessary to obtain support values of the same order of magnitude for the sugarbeet lines. The reproducibility of AFLP for seven primer combinations was investigated by repeated analysis of all steps from DNA isolation to data scoring. For 5088 comparisons, the overall reproducibility was 97.6%. Robustness to genotyping errors was investigated by including an artificial F1 (1 : 1 DNA mixture) of two sugarbeet lines in the screen for polymorphisms. For the 3160 cases of polymorphism between the two lines, 0.2% genotyping errors were found. The general reliability and usefulness of AFLP markers are discussed in relation to the results obtained.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    62
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
62
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!