Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Orofacial...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Remodeling along the Bone-screw Interface

Authors: Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Nico Laube; Thomas Michael Präger; Ralf Müller-Hartwich; Robert A. Mischkowski;

Remodeling along the Bone-screw Interface

Abstract

The stability of cortical miniscrews depends on the contact between bone and implant. The aim of this study was to compare bone remodeling along the contact surface between the screw and bone with and without pre-drilling.Twenty-four FAMI miniscrews (length 10 mm, diameter 2 mm) were inserted into the mandibular alveolar process apical to the premolars of four miniature pigs. Each pig received six screws, three on the one side with pre-drilling, three on the other side without pre-drilling. Polychrome fluorescent labels were used to assess the bone remodeling. After 12 weeks of osseointegration, all 24 screws and surrounding bone were removed. Microsections were prepared and analyzed histomorphometrically and under fluorescent microscopy. Differences between the groups were determined using the t test with a significance level of 5%.All the screws osseointegrated without any complications. Those without pre-drilling revealed a bone-screw contact of 64 +/- 11%, and those subjected to pre-drilling 63 +/- 12%. This difference was not significant. The mineral apposition rate, 1.6 +/- 0.4 microm/d and 1.7 +/- 0.4 microm/d, respectively, also failed to demonstrate any significant differences between the groups, while the portion of newly-formed bone in the pre-drilled group was significantly higher (59 +/- 9% vs. 27 +/- 6%).Significant differences in the bone-to-screw contact between the two groups are no longer in evidence after three months due to new bone formation. The minor extent of bone remodeling in the not pre-drilled group rules out substantial bone damage, which might have occurred during screw placement as a result of "cracks" or an excessive increase in pressure along the interface. The similar rate of new bone formation in both groups speaks against a stimulating effect of pre-drilling. Despite the absence of quantitative differences, it remains unclear whether the mechanical quality of the newly-formed bone resembles that of preexisting bone. Our findings seem to be applicable to the human mandible, however, its thinner cortical layer means less screw-to-bone contact is likely. We must reckon with less bone contact in the maxilla for the same reason.

Keywords

Dental High-Speed Technique, Swine, Bone Screws, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Mandible, Dental High-Speed Equipment, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Osseointegration, Alveolar Process, Animals, Swine, Miniature, Female, Bone Remodeling

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?