
doi: 10.1007/pl00014588
pmid: 11485246
Despite many investigations on the detection of trigeminal evoked potentials (TEP), there is still no consensus on a technique or interpretation of its components. In order to obtain clear TEP waveforms and analyze the origin of early components, we recorded TEP by the conventional far-field technique at the ipsilateral auricula as well as by near-field technique with a bipolar electrode at the trigeminal root just distal to the entry zone of its root. Trigeminal recordings were performed in nine patients with intrameatal vestibular schwannomas and in three with trigeminal neuralgia without trigeminal nerve deficits. In near-field recording at the trigeminal root, a triphasic response was recorded, with the first component occurring at 3.16 ms, 2.98 ms, and 4.16 ms following supraorbital, infraorbital, and mandibular nerve stimulation, respectively. Using conventional farfield TEP, the first component recorded at the trigeminal root occurred later than the first component in all other recordings. This suggests that the N2.0 component of far-field TEP is of extra-axial origin and the N5 component is of brainstem origin. The N13.0 component may be of cortical origin. We conclude that the N5.0 component and N5.0-N13.0 interpeak latency may be used as electrophysiological parameters of brainstem function during posterior fossa surgery.
Neural Conduction, Reproducibility of Results, Neuroma, Acoustic, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Reference Values, Reaction Time, Humans, Trigeminal Nerve, Electrodes, Evoked Potentials
Neural Conduction, Reproducibility of Results, Neuroma, Acoustic, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Reference Values, Reaction Time, Humans, Trigeminal Nerve, Electrodes, Evoked Potentials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
