
doi: 10.1007/pl00012360
pmid: 10390578
Abstract.One century ago surgical gloves were introduced to practice as part of the new antiseptic technique and originally to protect the hands of the surgeon and his assistants from the harmful dermatologic effects of powerful antiseptics (e.g., carbolic acid) in use at that time. Since then, the wearing of gloves during surgery has been standard practice. Furthermore, the protection value of surgical gloves in preventing cross‐infection has stood the test of time. Nevertheless, materials used in glove manufacturing have caused a succession of iatrogenic problems in surgical patients over the years. More recently, emergence of transmissible viruses, such as hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency virus, has led surgeons to consider their own safety with the frequent possibility of perforation of surgical gloves by sharp instruments. In this review we discuss the problems associated with surgical glove practice: glove powder‐induced peritonitis and adhesions, latex rubber‐associated hypersensitivity, and glove perforation.
Cross Infection, Infection Control, Iatrogenic Disease, HIV Infections, Tissue Adhesions, Antisepsis, Equipment Design, Peritonitis, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Occupational Diseases, Latex Hypersensitivity, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Humans, Equipment Failure, Gloves, Surgical, Powders
Cross Infection, Infection Control, Iatrogenic Disease, HIV Infections, Tissue Adhesions, Antisepsis, Equipment Design, Peritonitis, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Occupational Diseases, Latex Hypersensitivity, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Humans, Equipment Failure, Gloves, Surgical, Powders
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
