
doi: 10.1007/pl00010467
Art appraisal is widely regarded as a totally subjective matter. Nevertheless, discussions with art connoisseurs indicate that certain general applicable items are present. A call for comparability is definitely present. An art auction is, in a way, through the standardization of the amount of money paid, a standardization of all art involved. This paper tries to find a general applicable quality model for art appraisal. By the use of the widely accepted EFQM model all aspects are supposed to be covered in any field. The field of art is now subject to this model. It was found that the model was suitable for art; it copes with the various quality types in art as well as the time dependent nature of art appraisal. The EFQM model seemed to be a unique way to compare different works of art in a formalized fashion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
