Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Herzarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Herz
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Herz
Article . 2001
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Recommendations for Standardization of EBT and MSCT Scanning

Authors: S, Achenbach; W G, Daniel; W, Moshage;

Recommendations for Standardization of EBT and MSCT Scanning

Abstract

The detection and quantification of coronary calcifications by electron beam tomography (EBT) permits to diagnose coronary atherosclerosis in an early stage. Initial reports indicate that multislice spiral CT (MSCT) also permits the quantification of coronary calcium, while equivalency to EBT has not been definitely proven. Since image acquisition, reconstruction and evaluation parameters influence the results of calcium quantification with CT techniques, standardization of the investigation is mandatory to make results comparable.The article summarizes guidelines for image acquisition and evaluation by EBT and describes guidelines and consensus reports that were issued concerning the clinical use of the method.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Electrocardiography, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!