
doi: 10.1007/bfb0055645
Asynchronous cellular automata and asynchronous automata have been introduced by Zielonka [14] for the study of Mazurkiewicz traces. In [2] Droste & Gastin generalized the first to pomsets. We show that the expressiveness of monadic second order logic and asynchronous cellular automata are different in the class of all pomsets without auto-concurrency. Then we introduce a class where the expressivenesses coincide. This extends the results from [2]. Furthermore, we propose a generalization of trace asynchronous automata for general pomsets. We show that their expressive power coincides with that of monadic second order logic for a large class of pomsets. The universality and the equivalence of asynchronous automata for pomsets are proved to be decidable which is shown to be false for asynchronous cellular automata.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
