
doi: 10.1007/bfb0052832
It is desirable that data analysis tools become more autonomous in managing their computational resources, minimizing risk and cost, assessing their errors, developing new representations, and integrating with other data analysis tools. To aid in this development we introduce a design for using Meta-Reasoning in a Data Analysis Tool Allocation system that employs analogical and structural reasoning to learn from and across domains and its experience. We give a formal definition of a “Data Analysis Game” that allows the implementation of a hierarchical learning framework suitable for describing and exploring real-world analysis problems. The framework may also be used to analyze the performance of the Tool Allocation system itself, allowing it to self-optimize. If the integration of tools is performed correctly, it should allow a cost-efficient level of performance not obtainable with a single tool alone or with unsystematic use of a group of tools.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
